Let Them Play: Santa Clara University Football
Football image LET THEM PLAY.com
SUPPORTING THE RETURN OF FOOTBALL TO SANTA CLARA
Home
 
History & Tradition
Introduction
Annual Results
Coaching Records
All-Americans
Broncos In The NFL
Broncos In The Pros
Coaches
Fight Songs
Game Films
Game By Game Results
Hall of Famers
History
Record Book
Team Rosters
Victory Bell
 
Where Are They Now?
Former Coaches
Former Players
 
The Case For Football
Introduction
What Is Let Them Play?
Open Letter To SCU
Univ. Communications
What About Title IX?
What Kind of Program?
Football:True Or False?
Endowments and Football
What Is Division I-AA?
Schools Playing Football
Catholic College Football
New & Discontinued   College Programs
Case Studies & Articles
 
California I-AA Schools
---Cal Poly SLO
---Sacramento State
---UC-Davis
---San Diego
 
Message Board
Football Forum
 
How You Can Help
Contact LTPF
 

Let Them Play Foundation, Inc.
The Case For Santa Clara Football

On February 2, 1993, Santa Clara president Paul Locatelli, S.J. announced the discontinuation of football at the university, a move that stunned and saddened alumni and fans of the Bronco program. Since that day, a small group of alumni and friends of the program have sought the appropriate forum to make their case that football has a place at Santa Clara. Now, via this web site, the Let Them Play Foundation hopes to make its case--a case for football at Santa Clara.

Our discussion starts with the facts of the case at the time Santa Clara dropped football in 1993. A copy of the letter announcing the decision is posted here as well as a number of university documents presented to alumni.

The Santa Clara administration remarked that "the total direct cost of the football program has become prohibitive." Yet, how do other schools play football and succeed, many with substantially smaller budgets? What are the endowments at other schools that can afford football? If the University's numbers and assumptions are to be believed, perhaps the University would have been better off to have studied ways to improve the football program in 1993.

The University's assertion that the cost of football was prohibitive did not take into account a key fact. There were well over 100 players on the team and only 16 scholarships available to share among all the players. This means that over 85 academically qualified players were paying their own way to at the University. Their tuition and fees more than offset the $470,000 net cost of the program and actually resulted in the football program making money for the school. The University did not engage in any study of the football program in 1993 and made a hasty decision without consulting those Santa Clara family members who could have helped the program survive and thrive.

If so, what kind of program should be studied? Santa Clara, in order to maintain athletics in the context of its academic mission, should not seek "big-time" (Division I-A) status. The Foundation believes that a program classified as Division I-AA is the most appropriate and cost affordable for the Broncos. Please see our page outlining the differences between Division I-A and Division I-AA for more details on the subject.

As these arguments are made, a familiar series of refrains echoes from members of the Santa Clara administration. We have summarized these objections and our response in a page titled "Football: True Or False?"

  • Some will tell you that Title IX prohibits adding football...but it does not. Since 1993, a total of 43 universities have added football, with another seven scheduled within the next year. In fact, adding football could actually improve SCU's gender equity by enrolling more male students to a campus which is now disproportionately female.
  • Some will tell you adding football would hurt other SCU sports...but it would not. Our basketball and soccer teams were successful before football was dropped, have been successful since, and there is no reason to suggest it would not remain so in the future.
  • Some will tell you that SCU would have to lower its standards to find players...but it would not. The same type of football recruits from Northern California that once considered Santa Clara are now targets for many prominent Eastern schools. Columbia University, for example, has 29 Californians on its 2002 football roster.

    There are many reasons for the return of football to Santa Clara. Among them are increased academic opportunities for students of diverse backgrounds, better alumni and student relations, the return of a great tradition, and the increased opportunity for the university to attract qualified students who will contribute to the university's life as students and alumni.

    The Let Them Play Foundation welcomes your comments and is willing to engage in a further discussion with you regarding these issues. Thank you for your time and consideration.


    © 2008, Let Them Play Foundation, Inc., a 501(c)(3) charitable organization incorporated in the state of California. Not affiliated with Santa Clara University. Use of the words 'Santa Clara', 'Broncos', or other descriptions and accounts of Santa Clara Football are used solely within a fair use of same and is provided solely as a means of historical information and context to the public domain. All rights reserved.

  •